| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Jerick Ludhowe
Suicides-R-Us
Celsetial Being
93
   |
Posted - 2012.07.19 13:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
Mach was the size of a carrier..... Oh and obviously the fastest and most agile BS should be the largest
If you want to complain about the visuals on the mach how about complain about the fail ass turret placement on the ship... |
Jerick Ludhowe
Suicides-R-Us
Celsetial Being
93
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 14:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Carola Kessler wrote:Jerick Ludhowe wrote:Mach was the size of a carrier..... Oh and obviously the fastest and most agile BS should be the largest If you look at the design from the Machariel and its original lore beeing a hijacked design from Jove and transformed beeing transformed in a BS from Angel Cartel , maybe the size was cause its original intent beeing a Carrier from the Jovians...who knows.....but just look closer, from the middle of the Machariel could have started the figthers or other Drones.
It's not a carrier, it's a fast agile BS. Being the size of a carrier is foolish period. Considering that this game has a habit of contradicting its own contradictions... saying it should be the size of a carrier because it was based off a jove ship that could have been a carrier seems like a rather epic stretch.
|
Jerick Ludhowe
Suicides-R-Us
Celestial.Being
93
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 16:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Carola Kessler wrote:Jerick Ludhowe wrote:Carola Kessler wrote:Jerick Ludhowe wrote:Mach was the size of a carrier..... Oh and obviously the fastest and most agile BS should be the largest If you look at the design from the Machariel and its original lore beeing a hijacked design from Jove and transformed beeing transformed in a BS from Angel Cartel , maybe the size was cause its original intent beeing a Carrier from the Jovians...who knows.....but just look closer, from the middle of the Machariel could have started the figthers or other Drones. It's not a carrier, it's a fast agile BS. Being the size of a carrier is foolish period. Considering that this game has a habit of contradicting its own contradictions... saying it should be the size of a carrier because it was based off a jove ship that could have been a carrier seems like a rather epic stretch. Again seems you're not getting the point...the MAchariel Lorewise was a Hijacked Jove design...as H4 mentioned like me before, which ofcourse implemtents some Jove technics in its design and technical abilities makes the ship one of the agilest and fastes BS within game breaking this background meants breaking its reputation and history so.....according to that its still a joke and your explanations and points are not valid PERIOD. sincerly Carola Kessler 
No i get your point, i just think it's mongaloidish as lore has been contradicted so many times it's not even remotely a good argument to stand on. As for the whole carrier thing, keep grasping at straws... The ship looks nothing like a carrier, acts nothing like a carrier... Only similarity was the machs ludacris size... Now that's changing so give the whole "carrier" thing a rest.
Furthermore, if you consider a small change of size to 1 ship that makes it look far less ridiculous "game breaking" then your opinion is by default null and void to begin with.
|
Jerick Ludhowe
Suicides-R-Us
Celestial.Being
95
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 15:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Freundliches Feuer wrote:The mach was fine in size, its the capitals that are way too small... also the rifter needs to go down in size or at least make the guns bigger :/ its ridiculous...
2km long bs that is the fastest, most agile, and has a tiny sig. How was that ludacris insult to scale ever fine? To be honest the mach should be one of the smallest of all the battleships for reasons already stated as well as the fact jove Battleships tend to be smaller than the more traditional ones fielded by the four races.
Scale across all ships needs to be heavily reworked... Thrasher being larger than a rupture is just another example of foolish scaling.
|
Jerick Ludhowe
Toxic Waste Industries
100
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 17:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
to0onsi wrote:someone can just answer me why reduce the macha size ?!
I need to understand why...
It's been answered like 20 times between this and other threads.
|
Jerick Ludhowe
Toxic Waste Industries
108
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
Spc One wrote:I approve of this. Leave it at1936m as it currently is on TQ.  Even Hyperion is 1698m
Hyperion is far too big as well tbh.
|
Jerick Ludhowe
Toxic Waste Industries
108
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:01:00 -
[7] - Quote
Spc One wrote:Barbara Nichole wrote:As I've never really been fond of the Machariel I can't say my opinion counts a whole lot on this topic.. but you gotta admit it was pretty huge the way it was. It's not a cap ship. lol
I've flown next to a machariel in my providence and it nearly dwarfed me... perhaps a less dramatic reduction would be in order... but it probably did need some reduction. Well Machariel was designed that way. So it's a huge ship, i don't see any reason for changing it now. It was this way since it came out. It is a special ship after all.
Tons of things have been originally designed one way and then changed further down the road. This is an mmo and using the argument of "that's how it was designed originally don't change it" is a fail at best....
2km mach was unimmersive. The fastest most agile bs with a small sig being like 2x the size of the average bs was stupid looking, period. Furthermore all this crap about it being jove so it should be HUGE does not even make sense...
|
Jerick Ludhowe
Toxic Waste Industries
114
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 12:32:00 -
[8] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Perhaps the best overall solution to all these complaints is to establish a size range for each class, and resize all ships in that class to conform(with machs and hypes being at the large end of battleship, for instance, and all capships getting sized up. Has anyone noticed the huge variety in size for titans?)
This is the only acceptable outcome. Lets hope we get a good rescaling of ships, stations, and celestials in the near future.
|
Jerick Ludhowe
Toxic Waste Industries
115
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
Austneal wrote:So they've nerfed the Dramiel into uselessness, dwarfed the Machariel, and made the Cynabal look like Rudolph the red nosed reindeer.... anyone want to buy a set of angel ships?
Dram is not useless.... It's just no longer the best at everything frig it once was... Now the slower frigs are actually better at brawling Changes to the dram were a HUGE step forward...
Mach getting reduced in size a reason to not buy it? Really? REALLY?!! It's arguably the best sub cap in the game and it being smaller is not going to have ANY effect on this WHATSOEVER. All that's happening is the foolishly sized ship is being reduced to reasonable levels. Honestly I'd rather the mach go to like 1000m instead of 1400m it still feels far to big for it's speed, agility and sig. Smaller more "tech advanced" BS pwning the larger lower "tech" ships is way more bad ass anyway... |
| |
|